"This is a stunning triumph that will have an enormously constructive outcome on more than 30,000 drivers in London and transversely over England and Grains and for thousands more in various endeavors where sham autonomous work is flooding," said Maria Ludkin, legal boss for the GMB specialist's society that addressed the drivers. 

Under U.K. law, they could even case back pay for the period they've starting now worked for Uber, said Ed Marchant, a business lawyer at IBB masters. 

"From Uber's perspective the impressive additional cost coming to fruition in view of the judgment infers that they are presumably going to through and through change their arrangement of activity and furthermore pass these extra expenses onto customers," Marchant said. 

Uber said it would progress against the choice. 

"An enormous number of people in London drive with Uber effectively in light of the fact that they have to act actually used and their own specific supervisor. The mind lion's share of drivers who use the Uber application need to keep the open door and flexibility of having the ability to drive when and where they require," said Jo Bertram, the head of Uber U.K. 

Marchant said the choice could benefit other individuals who work in movement organizations and diverse regions of the "gig" economy. 

"There is most likely going to be a spate of related cases from other Uber drivers and those in practically identical organizations fighting that they are workers and met all requirements for tantamount focal points," he said. 

The GMB said it is starting now exploring contracts at various associations.